Thank you to the councillor (not from Newton Poppleford), who sent this ‘toolkit’ link to to SIN. Part Five deals with such matters as Code of Conduct, Complaints and Investigations, and Conflicts of Interest:
Bulldozing in Newton Poppleford
30 AprWhat is going on in Newton Poppleford?
Just over two weeks since a planning committee meeting ended in chaos after crude attempts to silence Cllr Graham Salter who opposed Clinton Devon Estates’ application to develop a site near King Alfred Way , another Parish Council meeting last night has raised eyebrows.
Cllr Salter again argued that the process, by which the King Alfred Way site was proposed for development, was fatally flawed. A roar of laughter greeted his revelation that Parish Clerk, David Atkins, had completed a questionnaire describing the land as flat. It’s on a hillside!
But Cllr Salter thought it a serious matter if this kind of inaccurate information was fed back to the EDDC as part of the SHLAA (Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment ) process. He proposed to repeat the SHLAA for Newton Pop following “proper procedures” but had no support from other councillors.
Some critics of the Clinton Devon Estates’ application think their offer to provide land for a new village hall is a “bribe” which is not needed by the village and their suspicions may have been confirmed by what happened next.
Minutes handed out stated that Cllr Dave Jefferies had said at a previous meeting that the Management Committee of the Village Hall, ‘may decide to sell the Hall’ But people at last night’s meeting claimed Cllr Jefferies had actually said the opposite, that there was no intention of selling the Hall. The councillor himself was not there to put the record straight but watch this space!
The village hall “offer” took another battering when the head teacher of the village school confirmed to the meeting that he would like the school hall to be used by the community when it is rebuilt in 2015. Christine Channon, County Councillor, who was present, supported the school’s chance for a rebuild.
Parish Clerk David Atkins then argued that there was an urgent need for development to provide a five year land supply for the District. Cllr Salter pointed out that the two proposed Feniton Developments had been turned down on 2nd April.
Mr Atkins – who, with another hat, is a member of EDDC’s Development Management Committee- said he’d been advised that one of the Feniton applications would “definitely go through”. He loudly said he considered this would have been “a practical solution”.
Cllr Salter retorted “Was that the one you voted for or the other one?” The public laughed.
Mr Atkins was one of the few to vote in favour of the first Feniton Application at the DMC, and had left the meeting before the second one was unanimously voted against.
The public asked Mr Atkins when the next meeting will be for the Parish Council to vote on King Alfred Way. He said he only had to give three days’ notice, but revealed that it would be on Monday 13th May 8 pm in the Newton Pop Village Hall.
Observers of Cllr Atkins’ long and chequered career are beginning to wonder about possible potential conflicts of interest in his role as parish clerk, who has negotiated closely with Clinton Estates over their Newton Poppleford plans, and his role as a member of the District “planning committee” which will decide on the application.
No-one would accuse Cllr Atkins of being “anti-development”, in fact some critics from Exmouth with long memories have claimed he belongs to the Build Everywhere Regardless of Consequences school!
Your vote WILL count
29 AprTo those who are thinking “Why bother to vote” please think again. It is possible that in some constituencies the decision may come down to a handful of votes. That handful will be crucial.
Tactical voting
29 AprFor those who are worried that an incumbent or other highly unpopular candidate may win power even if they are not wanted by the majority of voters, this article on tactical voting might be useful.
Two meetings at Knowle next week
29 AprBoth with agenda items of particular interest to East Devon Alliance members:
7th May Development Management Committee .
From 11 am, Ottery St Mary planning applications will be discussed.
From 2pm other planning applications on the agenda include yet-another highly controversial Planning Application, this time for Waldron’s Farm. Also, a new application on land on a Budleigh Salterton floodplain.
See http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/combined_dmc_agenda_070513_.pdf
8th May, 5.30pm. EDDC Cabinet meeting. Includes discussion of possible schedule change for Freedom Of Information (FOI) Requests. EDDC has received a lot of FOIs over the past year.
(SIN: What possible reason could there be for this situation to have arisen?) Here’s the agenda: http://www.eastdevon.gov.uk/combined_agenda_080513_public_version.pdf
Who’s signed EDA Charter?
28 AprThe fifty-two Devon County Council candidates have been invited to sign this: Charter of the East Devon Alliance
Here is the list of signatories, from all parties, to date:
Paul Hayward Independent Axminster
Sylvia Brownlee UKIP Broadclyst & Whimple
Henry Gent Green Party Broadclyst & Whimple
Roger Saunders Green Party Budleigh
Oliver Davey Green Party Exmouth Brixington & Withycombe
John Hone UKIP Exmouth Brixington & Withycombe
Tim Dumper Liberal Democrat Exmouth Halsdon & Woodbury
Bernard Hughes Conservative Exmouth Halsdon & Woodbury
Ray Davison Labour Exmouth Littleham & Town
Ben Jones Green Party Exmouth Littleham & Town
Ann Prior UKIP Exmouth Littleham & Town
Jonathan Underwood Liberal Democrat Honiton St Michael’s
Sharon Pavey Green Party Honiton St. Michael’s
Cathy Gardner Independent Honiton St Paul’s
Paul Newman Liberal Democrat Honiton St Paul’s
Martin Paine Green Party Honiton St Paul’s
Andrew Blackwell Labour Ottery St Mary Rural
John Kelly UKIP Ottery St Mary Rural
Claire Wright Independent Ottery St Mary Rural
Jim Knight Conservative Seaton Coastal
Judy Blackwell Labour Sidmouth Sidford
Lawrie Brownlee UKIP Sidmouth Sidford
Stuart Hughes Conservative Sidmouth Sidford
Susie Bond Independent Feniton & Buckerell
List correct at time of publication 24
Question Time with candidates at Sidmouth hustings (Mon 29 April)
28 AprSend questions in advance, or bring them on the night (by 7.10 pm) . Details at http://www.saveoursidmouth.com
Remember, Devon County Council elections are this week, Thursday 2nd May, 7 am -10 pm.
“The work of scrutiny…”
25 Apr..is made clear in a report that was on the agenda at today’s Devon County Council meeting (25 April) .
A SIN correspondent notes:
The meeting which was (as usual) webcast, included item 12: “Scrutiny Annual report 2012/13”.
There are a few interesting comments in the written report emphasising the value to DCC of an effective and independent scrutiny function (eg p7 “Scrutiny is not just about a Cabinet Member of Officers turning up to present a glowing report of progress……..”)
Cllr Brian Greenslade, when discussing the report, said: “The work of scrutiny doesn`t stop just because an election is taking place.”
Who gets your vote on 2nd May?
25 AprThere’s nothing like a chance to meet the candidates, to make up your mind! So Vision Group for Sidmouth has organised a hustings (evening of 29th April, Kennaway House cellar bar) , with those standing for the Sidmouth/ Sidford Division in next Thursday’s County Council Elections. Details today at http://www.saveoursidmouth.com
Axminster Town Council refuses to be recorded
24 AprView from newspapers publish an account of an Axminster Town Council meeting where a councillor (Paul Hayward) suggested that meetings should be recorded and offered to purchase the recording equipment himself and do all the trials. However, the offer was refused by a 5-4 vote.
Which makes us wonder what is happening to the decision to record EDDC meetings. Councillor Ian Thomas put a lot of effort into proving that a small outlay (very, very small in the tens of pounds) would mean that council meetings could be recorded and posted to the internet. Councillors were reluctant to give it the go ahead until the next annual council meeting, which is now due in May 2013.
Let us hope that what was agreed goes ahead. If not, we have to find people with an eidetic memory (being able to perfectly recall images, sounds or objects – thanks Big Bang Theory ) for future council meetings! Or lean on Eric Pickles who has said time and time again that it is our right to have recorded meetings and to be able to blog and tweet about them but who has not codified his advice into law (yet).